How is the process working?
Review a procedure or quality program against your defined requirements and follow the gaps into assigned work.
Custom audits & corrective action
Your requirements. Your audit. A connected path to closure.
Build an audit around the work you need to assess. Carry each observation into a finding, a response and the evidence needed for a reviewer to decide what happens next.
For internal quality teams, supplier-quality leads, site operators and consultants coordinating assessment work.
Custom audit / pinned requirementsInspect screen
01 / Define the assessment
Start with the questions your operation needs answered.
Structure the audit into sections and requirements. Define the assessment scope and supporting material, then give the people doing the work a guided place to capture observations and evidence.
What does the partner need to show?
Organize the agreed criteria, observations and requests so the supplier and reviewing team can follow the same issue.
Can the operating record support the practice?
Connect assessment questions to receiving, storage, segregation, procedures, training and release evidence.
02 / Keep the finding moving
A finding needs more than a status.
- OBSERVECapture what was found
Record the requirement, assessment, notes and relevant evidence from the audit.
- ASSIGNMake the next action explicit
Identify the finding, responsibility, due date and the response being requested.
- RESPONDKeep the correction with its evidence
Connect the response, corrective work and supporting records to the original finding.
- REVIEWEvaluate the response
Review the evidence and follow-up conditions before recording the closure decision.
A complete handoff
Follow the audit demonstration → The auditor identifies the gap. The assigned owner supplies the response and evidence. The reviewer assesses whether the response addresses the finding. Receiving a file and accepting its evidence are separate steps.
03 / Connect the quality work
Follow the issue into the operating system.
Evidence requests & responses
Ask for the specific record needed, assign responsibility and review what comes back. Keep context and follow-up attached to the issue.
Corrective action & CAPA
Connect the finding to corrective work where your process requires it. Retain investigation, action and effectiveness evidence for review.
Procedures & training
A finding may require a controlled revision or a training response. Link that work to the procedure and people involved.
Review & export
Use the audit's findings, checklist, evidence, response and activity views to review the work. Assemble the supporting material for the next discussion.
04 / Put your process to work
Configure the workflow around your assessment.
Can we use our own checklist?
Use your requirements and assessment structure to define the audit. The walkthrough starts with the sections, evidence expectations and follow-up process you need to manage.
Can different people conduct, respond to and review the audit?
Yes. Assign the appropriate roles and access for the engagement. Map who conducts the assessment, owns the response and has authority to review the evidence during configuration.
Does every finding require a CAPA?
Your quality process determines the response. The system can link corrective action and CAPA work; the responsible team determines applicability and the evidence needed for closure.
Can an operating partner help run the program?
An implementation or quality partner can support a separately scoped engagement. Access is explicitly assigned to the work involved. Explore AsianOPS supplier audit expertise →
Start with your workflow
Show us the checklist you work from.
We will walk through its requirements, the evidence you collect and how findings should move between the people responsible for resolution.
Request an audit walkthrough